Affiliate disclosure

Updated 2026

Any site that writes about gambling platforms has to answer one question before anything else: who pays for it. The answer here, without hedging, is that biglucky.info may earn a commission when a reader moves from these pages to the operator and opens an account there. Nothing about that costs the reader anything, and it changes none of the operator's terms, bonuses or limits — the tag records where a visit came from and does nothing else.

How the mechanism works

Some buttons and links here carry an affiliate identifier. When one is clicked, the operator's system registers the visit as having come from this source, and an account opened afterwards may generate a payment. Reporting arrives in aggregate: counts, not people. The site cannot see whose account was opened, what was played or how much money moved, and it holds no access to any account. What this site records about a reader is described separately on the privacy page.

What the arrangement does and does not reach

ElementCan commission influence itWhy
The measures and weights in an assessmentNoThey are published and identical for every subject
Publishing unfavourable findingsNoWeaknesses are stated as plainly as strengths
The figures quoted in articlesNoThey are lifted from the operator's own terms unchanged
Which platform the site coversPartly, yesThe site focuses on one operator, and that deserves saying out loud

That final row is the honest part most disclosures leave out. A site built around a single platform is not a neutral directory, and a reader should factor that in. It is also why the material here includes the arguments against opening an account at all: there is no Finnish supervision, Finnish-language service is limited, and the route available in a dispute is shorter than it would be with a licensed operator.

Why transparency carries extra weight here

In an offshore setting there is no domestic authority policing either the platform or the way it is written about. When no external inspector exists, disclosure is the only protection actually available: the reader sees where the money comes from and can weigh the text accordingly. It is the same principle this site applies to players themselves, who are advised to document their own dealings — a record substitutes for supervision that is not there.

Three checks a reader can run

First, compare the figures published here with the operator's own terms. If they diverge, the source is not independent. Second, look for unfavourable findings; unbroken praise is advertising no matter what the small print says. Third, check whether the writing carries a name and a stated method — those are on the author page, and the weighting behind the score is set out on the review page.

Responsibility and contact

A commercial relationship does not make this site a representative of the operator. Accounts, balances, bonuses and payments are the operator's responsibility and can only be settled there; this site accepts no stakes and holds no funds. The rules for using the publication itself sit on the terms page. If anything here reads as unclear or as inconsistent with another page, an email is enough — the passage is either corrected or explained more fully.

Questions about the funding model

Does using these links cost the reader anything?
No. Terms, bonuses and limits are identical whether a visit arrives through this site or by typing the operator's address directly.
Can an operator buy a better score?
No. The measures and weights are published, and the score follows from them. Shortcomings are written up regardless of any commercial relationship.
Can this site see my account activity?
It cannot. Affiliate reporting is aggregated counts. Account activity is visible only to the operator and to the player.
Why cover only one platform?
Because a single subject can be kept current as its terms move. The narrowness is disclosed instead of disguised, so a reader can judge the coverage accordingly.
Play Now